# Tout entière · Wholly One

Les Fleurs du mal · Charles Baudelaire · Spleen and Ideal

Source: https://1732studios.com/books/baudelaire/tout-entiere. Data: https://1732studios.com/books/baudelaire/tout-entiere.json.

**1** Le Démon, dans ma chambre haute  
The Demon, in my high room,
> «haut» — high, upper: «haut» means 'high'; «ma chambre haute» is 'my high room', an upper chamber set above the street. The capitalized «Démon» enters this lofty, near-monastic space at once — the tempter climbing to the poet's heights, the everyday French «chambre» (bedroom) lifted by «haute» into something almost a tower.

**2** Ce matin est venu me voir,  
Came this morning to see me,
> «venir» in the passé composé with «être»: «venir» (to come) forms its passé composé with «être», not «avoir»: «est venu» = 'came / has come', and the participle «venu» would agree with a feminine or plural subject. «venir + infinitive» means 'to come (in order) to do' — «est venu me voir» = 'came to see me'. The pronoun «me» sits before the infinitive «voir» it belongs to.

**3** Et, tâchant à me prendre en faute  
And, trying to catch me at fault,
> «tâcher à» — the present participle, archaic «à»: «tâchant» is the present participle of «tâcher» (to try, to strive), here describing the Demon: 'trying to'. Modern French prefers «tâcher de + infinitive»; Baudelaire keeps the older «tâcher à», which gives the line an archaic poise. «prendre en faute» is the idiom 'to catch (someone) in the wrong, at fault'.

**4** Me dit: «Je voudrais bien savoir  
Said to me: "I should very much like to know
> «voudrais» — the conditional as polite wish: «voudrais» is the conditional of «vouloir» (to want), softening 'I want' into 'I should like / I would like'. Reinforced by «bien», «je voudrais bien savoir» = 'I should very much like to know'. The conditional lends the Demon a mock courtesy — the tempter's question arrives wrapped in drawing-room politeness, opening the «guillemets» that hold his speech to the end of the poem.


**5** Parmi toutes les belles choses  
Among all the beautiful things
> «parmi» — among: «parmi» means 'among, amid', used for things one is set in the midst of. «parmi toutes les belles choses» = 'among all the beautiful things'. The anaphora — «Parmi … / Parmi …» across this stanza — lays the woman out as an inventory of parts, exactly the division the soul will go on to refuse.

**6** Dont est fait son enchantement,  
Of which her enchantment is made,
> «dont» — relative 'of which', with inversion: «dont» is the relative pronoun standing for «de + …» ('of which, whose'): «les belles choses dont est fait son enchantement» = 'the beautiful things of which her enchantment is made'. The verb is fronted before its subject — «est fait son enchantement» rather than «son enchantement est fait» — a poetic inversion that lets «enchantement» fall, weighted, at the line's end.

**7** Parmi les objets noirs ou roses  
Among the objects black or pink

**8** Qui composent son corps charmant,  
That compose her charming body,
> «composer» — to make up, to compose: «composer» here is 'to make up, to constitute' rather than 'to write music'; «les objets … qui composent son corps» = 'the objects that make up her body'. The Demon's premise is that the body is composed of separable parts — «objets noirs ou roses», 'black or pink objects' — and his trap is to ask which single part the poet prefers.


**9** Quel est le plus doux.» — Ô mon âme!  
Which is the sweetest." — O my soul!
> «le plus doux» — the superlative: «le plus + adjective» forms the superlative: «le plus doux» = 'the sweetest'. The Demon's question closes here — the «guillemets» shut after «doux» — and the em-dash «—» wrenches the poem back to the speaker's own cry, «Ô mon âme!» ('O my soul!'), as the soul prepares to answer the tempter.

**10** Tu répondis à l'Abhorré:  
You answered the Abhorred One:
> «répondis» — the passé simple: «répondis» is the passé simple (literary past) of «répondre» (to answer), 'you answered' — a tense reserved for written narration, here giving the soul's reply the finality of scripture. «l'Abhorré» ('the Abhorred One') is a coined epithet for the Demon, the past participle of «abhorrer» (to abhor) capitalized into a proper name, like a title of the Devil.

**11** «Puisqu'en Elle tout est dictame  
"Since in Her all is balm,
> «puisque» — since, given that: «puisque» introduces a reason taken as already granted ('since, seeing that'), unlike «parce que» which answers 'why?'. It elides before a vowel: «puisqu'en Elle». The soul's whole rebuttal turns on this premise — «puisque … tout est dictame», 'since everything in her is balm' — from which the next line draws its conclusion. «Elle» is capitalized to near-divinity.
> «le dictame» — balm, healing herb: «le dictame» is dittany, an aromatic herb the ancients prized as a wound-healer, and so by extension a balm or sovereign remedy. Saying «tout est dictame» — 'everything (in her) is balm' — makes the beloved wholly healing, every part of her a cure, which is why no single part can be 'preferred' over the rest.

**12** Rien ne peut être préféré.  
Nothing can be preferred.
> «rien … ne» and the passive infinitive: Negation in French is two-part: «rien» pairs with «ne» around the verb — «rien ne peut» = 'nothing can'. «être préféré» is a passive infinitive ('to be preferred'), with «préféré» agreeing as a participle. The line is the poem's hinge: because all of her is balm, no part «peut être préféré» — can be singled out and ranked above another.


**13** Lorsque tout me ravit, j'ignore  
When everything ravishes me, I cannot tell
> «ravir» — to ravish, to delight utterly: «ravir» means 'to carry off, to enrapture, to delight beyond measure' — the older sense of English 'ravish'. «tout me ravit» = 'everything ravishes / enraptures me'. «Lorsque» ('when') opens the condition that the rest of the sentence answers: when the whole of her transports the poet at once, he can no longer isolate a cause.

**14** Si quelque chose me séduit.  
If some one thing seduces me.
> «ignorer si» — 'not to know whether': «ignorer» is a false friend: it means 'not to know, to be unaware', not 'to ignore'. «j'ignore si quelque chose me séduit» = 'I do not know whether any single thing seduces me'. The indirect question rides «si» ('whether') across the line break — the poet, ravished by the whole, cannot say which part charms him.

**15** Elle éblouit comme l'Aurore  
She dazzles like the Dawn
> «éblouir» — to dazzle: «éblouir» is 'to dazzle, to blind with brightness'. «Elle éblouit comme l'Aurore» = 'she dazzles like the Dawn'. «l'Aurore» is the dawn (and the goddess Aurora); capitalized, it pairs with «la Nuit» ('the Night') in the next line to set the beloved between two cosmic extremes — she does the work of both day's blaze and night's solace.

**16** Et console comme la Nuit;  
And consoles like the Night;


**17** Et l'harmonie est trop exquise,  
And the harmony is too exquisite,
> «trop … pour que» + subjunctive: «trop … pour que» means 'too … for (something to happen)' and forces the subjunctive in the clause it governs. The structure spans three lines: «l'harmonie est trop exquise … Pour que l'impuissante analyse En note les nombreux accords» — 'the harmony is too exquisite for powerless analysis to note its many chords'. «En note» is the subjunctive of «noter»; the whole is too perfect for the dividing mind to itemize.

**18** Qui gouverne tout son beau corps,  
That governs her whole fair body,

**19** Pour que l'impuissante analyse  
For powerless analysis
> «impuissant» — powerless, impotent: «impuissant» means 'powerless, unable, impotent'; the feminine «impuissante» agrees with «analyse». «l'impuissante analyse» = 'powerless analysis' — the dissecting intellect that takes a thing apart. The poem's argument is anti-analytic: the beloved's harmony is too fine for any breaking-down to catalogue, so the mind that would name her parts is left helpless.

**20** En note les nombreux accords.  
To note down its many chords.
> «les accords» — chords, harmonies: «un accord» is a musical chord, and more widely an agreement or accord between parts. «les nombreux accords» = 'the many chords' of the harmony that governs her body. The metaphor is musical: she is a single harmony made of countless chords sounding together, which 'powerless analysis' could never write out note by note.


**21** Ô métamorphose mystique  
O mystic metamorphosis

**22** De tous mes sens fondus en un!  
Of all my senses melted into one!
> «fondu» — past participle of «fondre»: «fondus» is the past participle of «fondre» (to melt, to fuse), agreeing in the masculine plural with «mes sens» ('my senses'): «fondus en un» = 'melted / fused into one'. This is Baudelairean synesthesia — the senses run together until breath becomes music and voice becomes scent in the final couplet, the many made indivisibly one.

**23** Son haleine fait la musique,  
Her breath makes the music,
> «l'haleine» — breath: «l'haleine» is the breath one exhales (distinct from «le souffle», a current of breath or wind). «Son haleine fait la musique» = 'her breath makes the music'. The crossing of senses lands here: a breath, properly felt or smelled, is heard as music — and in the next line a voice is breathed as perfume, sense fused into sense.

**24** Comme sa voix fait le parfum!»  
As her voice makes the perfume!"
> «comme» completing the synesthesia: «comme» here means 'just as, in the same way that', balancing this clause against «Son haleine fait la musique»: breath is to music as voice is to perfume. «sa voix fait le parfum» = 'her voice makes the perfume' — sound become scent. The closing «guillemets» shut the soul's long reply, and the senses end wholly merged, the poem's title made flesh.

---

Source text: public domain (Charles Baudelaire, d. 1867). English translation: © 2026 1732 Studios, LLC — original draft, pending editorial review.